The blog, and your general writing, should be a bit more sustained. Well I think MOST of you presented really great comparisons to an issue/experience/event and the texts, most of the comparisions were not fully fleshed out or developed. You should be TYPING THE WHOLE BLOG SESSION. If we need to, we will make the blog session totally quiet so that you aren't distracted by peers, music, etc. Let's not have to resort to this, okay?
I suggest you open up a microsoft word document and type your response in there so you can better estimate the length. I suggest you clarify your terms and ideas more fully so that we can all start responding to each other's comments and having a really academic conversation on the blog.
Clarence's question was posted and it is a good question! Domenic started to respond to it, but he could (and you all will) go a little deeper to consider the consequences of inaccessibility and the cultural codes we are teaching our younger generations by not thinking about accessibility in our city planning and/or as a priority.
Please respond to his question and please see my responses to your blog posts.
If the whole is equal to the sum of its parts than our "whole" cannot be reached until our parts are gathered and acknowledged. This blog will act as a collection, a gallery that records our “parts and particles” (our particulars) in an effort to connect the dots; to endlessly connect the dots.
No comments:
Post a Comment