I'm drawing from Prop. 8 being struck down, which had prevented same-sex marriage in the state of California, to compare to Persepolis. Both are events of cultural revolution where the conservative right are keeping fast to antique ideals that are too restricting and persecuting to be carried out in a modern society. This refers to "the other" where the fear of the unknown leads to generalizing. Satrapi alike has been victim of this, seen as "that Iranian girl." Another connection is the struggle for identity within culture, in which both the ban and Satrapi pertain to. Overall, they both go back to the root of wanting to confirm their liberation against oppressive forces to follow personal pursuits.
It's interesting to consider the other side. What else, besides generalizing, "allows" the repressive regimes to endure and even gain popularity? Why would many people--and not just politicians and lawmakers--hold onto more outdated idea?
ReplyDeleteYour use of the word "antique" is very interesting Charlie. Culturally, we value antiques (we even go antique hunting); there is a difference between (in our culture) a used clothing store and a vintage clothing store, a difference between an old lamp and an antique lamp. By choosing that word, are you suggesting that there are values or something "higher" contained within these "antique ideas"?